What are the skills a child needs for kindergarten?
There is one skill that matters above all others, because it is the prime
predictor of school success or failure: the child’s vocabulary upon
entering school. Yes, the child goes to school to learn new words, but
the words he or she already knows determine how much of what the teacher
says will be understood. And since most instruction for the first four
years of school is oral, the child who has the largest vocabulary will
understand the most, while the child with the smallest vocabulary grasps
the least.
Once they begin reading, personal vocabulary feeds (or frustrates) comprehension.
And, since school grows increasingly complicated with each grade, that's
why school-entry vocabulary tests predict so accurately.
How is It that some kids get a head start on
vocabulary?
Conversation is the prime garden in which vocabulary grows, but conversations
vary greatly from home to home. Consider the eye-opening
findings of Drs.
Betty Hart and Todd Risley at the University
of Kansas from their research on children’s early lives. But before
I share that, let me tell you how I share this with parents, because I'm
often asked by educators how I manage to share this without insulting
someone. Here's how I introduced it to 150 Title 1 (poverty) parents in
Tennessee one morning:
"I'm going to tell you a secret now—a government secret. It's
the equivalent of all that smoking and cancer research—except this
tells us why certain kids' brains live long and why other children's brain's
die young. The government has known this since 1996, yet no president
has talked about it publicly, Democrat or Republican, no governor will
talk about it. They're all afraid that if they shared this research, some
of you might be insulted and then they'd lose votes. Instead, they told
you a lie, that it was all the fault of schools and the awful teachers.
That gets them some votes—but it's a lie. I'm not running for office,
so I don't have to lie. I hope you're not insulted by what I'm going to
tell you, but—honestly? I'm more interested in helping your child
than saving your feelings. So here's the secret. Here's what helps your
children the most and here's what hurts them the most."
And then I told them about the research you'll read next. They gave me
a standing ovation, so I guess they felt more informed
than insulted.
Published as Meaningful Differences in the Everyday
Experience of Young American Children,17 the research
began in response to what Hart and Risley saw among the
four-year-olds in the university lab school. With many children, the
lines were already drawn. Some were far advanced and some far behind.
When these same children were tested at age three and then again at
nine, the differences held. What caused the differences so early?
The researchers began by identifying 42 normal families representing
three socioeconomic groups: welfare, working class, and professional.
Beginning when the children were seven months old, researchers visited
the homes for one hour a month, and continued their visits for two and
one-half years. During each visit, the researcher tape-recorded and transcribed
by hand any conversations and actions taking place in front of the child.
Through 1,300 hours of visits, they accumulated 23 million bytes of information
for the project database, categorizing every word (noun, verb, adjective,
etc.) said in front of the child.
The project held some surprises: Regardless of socioeconomic level, all
42 families said and did the same things with their children. In other
words, the basic instincts of good parenting are there for most people,
rich or poor.
And then the researchers received the data printout and saw the “meaningful
differences” among the 42 families.
hen
the daily number of words for each group of children was
projected across four years, the four-year-old child from the professional
family will have heard 45 million words, the working-class child 26 million,
and the welfare child only 13 million. All three children will show up for
kindergarten on the same day, but one will have heard 32 million fewer words.
If No Child Left Behind expects the teacher to get this child caught-up,
she'll have to speak 10 words a second for 900 hours to reach the 32-million
mark by year's end. I hope they have life support ready for her.
The word gap among those children has nothing to do with how much those
parents love them. They all love their children and want
the best for them, but some parents have a better idea
of what needs to be said and done to reach that best. They know the child
needs to hear words repeatedly in meaningful sentences and questions,
and they know that plunking a two-year-old down in front of a television
set for three hours at a time is more harmful than meaningful. Sociologists
Farkas and Beron studied the research on 6,800 children from ages 3 to
12, and found that children from the lower SES were far more likely to
arrive at school with smaller vocabularies (12-14 months behind) and they
seldom made up the loss as they grew older.18(See
the summer-loss chart.)
The message in this kind of research is unambiguous: It’s not the
toys in the house that make the difference in children’s lives;
it’s the words in their heads. The least expensive thing we can
give a child outside of a hug turns out to be the most
valuable: words. You don’t need a job, a checking account, or even
a high school diploma to talk with a child. If I could
select any piece of research that all parents would be
exposed to, Meaningful Differences would be the one. And
that's feasible. The authors took their 268-page book and
condensed it into a six-page
article for American
Educator (Spring, 2003), the journal
of the American Federation of Teachers, which may be freely
reproduced by schools.19
If schools are to enlist the help of the 7,800-hour curriculum, then
we must stop telling parents lies about schools, and the
truth about what helps and hurts children the most.
In the Spring of 2003, the Policy Information
Center of Educational Testing Service (ETS) published a report
called Reading
and Literacy in America, describing the wide and growing literacy
gap between American social classes, one they could
trace all the way back to kindergarten. According to
ETS' research, little of what occurs between kindergarten
and 12th grade changes the chasm of achievement uncovered
in the findings of
Hart and Risley. To view charts of
their findings, see Income-Literacy.
The
latest in IT for the newest baby genius
The same
mind set that gave us product lines that would produce "instant
baby geniuses" (aka baby Einsteins)
has now found the Hart-Risley research and produced
an iPod-sized device that will count the number of
words you say to your budding genius each day. For
more information (and commentary), see Keeping
Tabs on Baby-Talk. (This is not an endorsement,
by any means.)
Questions covered in Chapter 1
of the print and web editions of The Read-Aloud Handbook:
To
search this site, use the Google search
engine to the left. You can also consult the Site
Contents page. Occasionally Google reports
older, out-of-date pages ("404
Error") which can usually be found using
the Internet
Archives (pasting the missing URL
into
the "WayBackMachine" space).
COPYRIGHT NOTICE Trelease on Reading is copyright 2006,
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 by Jim Trelease and Reading Tree
Productions.
All rights reserved. Any problems
or queries about this site should be directed
to:
Reading Tree Webmaster